Back to Questions
Want to know:
A citizen of State A asserted a state law claim of $80,000 against a citizen of State B in the federal district court. The State B citizen has a state law claim against another citizen of State B for $90,000 that arose out of the same transaction or occurrence as the original complaint. As a result, the State B citizen brought a third-party action against that person.Does the court have subject matter jurisdiction over the State B citizen's claim in the third-party action?A No, because the amount in controversy is insufficient.B No, because there is no diversity of citizenship.C Yes, because the requirements of diversity jurisdiction have been met.D Yes, because the court has supplemental jurisdiction.
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- Environmental Impact Statement gave teeth to what act?
- In many states, if foreclosure and auction does not produce enough money to satisfy the debt owed by the mortgagor, the creditor-mortgagee can still sue the debtor for the balance owed, called a remainder.
- To request a union certification election, at least 50 percent of the eligible workers within the bargaining unit should sign authorization cards.A. falseB. true