Back to Questions
Want to know:
A landscaper from State A sued a homeowner from State B in a state court in State B.The landscaper is seeking $100,000 as compensation for tortious injuries caused by the homeowner's allegedly negligent acts in State B. The homeowner filed a notice of removal in the federal court in State B. The landscaper filed a motion to remand to the state court.Should the court grant the landscaper's motion to remand?A No, because the federal court may use supplemental jurisdiction to establish subject-matter jurisdiction.B No, because the federal court has subject-matter jurisdiction under the diversity statute.C Yes, because the homeowner is a citizen of State B, the state in which the action was brought.D Yes, because the notice of removal should have been filed in state court.
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- The bailee in a bailment for the sole benefit of the bailor owes a slight duty of care while the object is in the bailee's possession.
- Koch traded Machine 1 for Machine 2 when the fair market value of both machines was $49,500. Koch originally purchased Machine 1 for $76,000, and Machine 1's adjusted basis was $40,500 at the time of the exchange. Machine 2's seller purchased it for $64,500 and Machine 2's adjusted basis was $55,500 at the time of the exchange. What is Koch's adjusted basis in Machine 2 after the exchange?
- What form is the Domestic Violence Protective Order?