Back to Questions
Want to know:
An ecologist, a citizen of State A, sued a cab driver, a citizen of State B, in the federal district court in State C. The ecologist is seeking $77,000 in damages for tortious injuries caused by the cab driver's allegedly negligent driving while the ecologist and cab driver were in State D. The cab driver was served with process while on vacation in State C, in accordance with State C law.What is cab driver's strongest argument against litigating the case in State C?A court should dismiss lawsuit because it does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over the cause of action.B court should dismiss lawsuit because it does not have personal jurisdiction over the cab driver.C court should transfer the lawsuit to a State D state court because it is inconvenient for the cab driver to litigate in State C.D court should dismiss the lawsuit because State C is not a proper venue to litigate the cause of action.
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- Where property is owned by more than one person
- A comprehensive plan to allow a city to grow in an orderly and sound manner
- In a Section 351 transaction, Thomas transferred the following assets to Harp Corp. in exchange for all of its stock:Assets Basis ValueEquipment$60,000$50,000Building$200,000$180,000Land$50,000$100,000Assuming no special election has been made, what is Harp Corp.'s basis in the equipment?a)$60,000b)$50,000c)$53,030d)$63,030