Back to Questions
Want to know:
Breakage of spillage of CS must be recorded on DEA form...
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- What form is the Domestic Violence Civil Summons?
- Y corporation manufactures computer processors and is incorporated in North Carolina. Its only factory, which employs 350 people, is located in Fayetteville, North Carolina. One of the processors has a defect where it squirts arsenic through a computer's fans and into an unsuspecting user's coffee. The user (domiciled in South Carolina) drinks the coffee and gets seriously ill. She sues Y corporation in federal court for damages in excess of $75,000. Y corporation files an affidavit saying that its headquarters is in Columbia, South Carolina. It is renting out a building that has a headquarters sign in front of it. Jurisdictional discovery reveals that its high ranking officials do most of their work in an office building next to the Fayetteville, North Carolina factory. They go to the Columbia, South Carolina office once a year for an annual corporate retreat. Can Y corporation get the federal court to dismiss for lack of diversity jurisdiction? Be able to point to specific language in the opinion to justify your answer.A.Yes because both it and the plaintiff are South Carolina citizens.B.Yes because its principal place of business is in South Carolina.C.No because there is complete diversity.D.No because the plaintiff chose federal court.
- John sues Y corporation for failure to warn that its computers had defective processors. He submits a request for documents asking the company to search the computers of 300 current scientists and computers and storage devices associated with 200 former scientists who worked at the company at one point. He has gotten to depose 20 scientists who have told him about the process of developing the processors, explained why the one in his computer didn't work, and talked about discussions of why the company refused to warn customers about the processor. However, he heard from a friend that there was an email sent at some point in the past 10 years where the company admitted to deliberately using cheaper silicon to save money. True or false, a court applying Tucker would deny John's motion to compel.