Back to Questions
Want to know:
Legal Concepts63) Leona drove into an eatery and ordered Volcano Chicken. Harry, who took her order, was anew employee who had started working in the eatery the same day. When asked if the chickenshe ordered was very spicy, Leona was informed by Harry—who was not aware of all details ofthe eatery yet—that it was not. However, when Leona took a bite, she found the hot sauceextremely spicy which resulted in her choking on the piece of chicken and requiring medicalhelp. Which of the following statements is true in this context?A) Harry can be sued for fraud in inducement.B) Harry's employment can be terminated for having committed fraud in inception.C) Harry can be sued for innocent misrepresentation.D) Harry cannot be sued for innocent misrepresentation.
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- Factual Application45) ________ is an event that occurs when one person consciously decides to induce anotherperson to rely and act on a misrepresentation.A) Fraudulent misrepresentationB) Unilateral mistakeC) Bilateral mistakeD) Erroneous misrepresentation
- Legal Concepts7Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc.39) Heather chooses to buy a scarf at Macy's and reads the price on the tag as $50. She uses hercredit card to pay for the scarf, but post-purchase, she notices that the price tag actually says$500. This is an instance of a(n) ________.A) bilateral mistakeB) mutual mistake of valueC) innocent misrepresentationD) unilateral mistake
- intentional confinement or restraint of another person without justification