Back to Questions
Want to know:
pedestrian from State A sued a motorcyclist from State B. The pedestrian properly filed suit in a state court located in the Eastern District of State A and sought $100,000 in damages for the tortious injuries caused by the motorcyclist's allegedly negligent acts in the Western District of State A.motorcyclist filed a notice of removal in the federal court for the Eastern District of State A, which geographically embraces the location of where the action was originally filed.Is removal proper?A. Yes, because the requirements of complete diversity are satisfied.B. Yes, because the lawsuit was filed in state court in the Eastern District of State A.C. No, because the motorcyclist is a citizen of State B.D. No, because the accident occurred in the Western District of State A.
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- True or false: Under no circumstances will a shareholder who has shares redeemed be able to treat the stock redemption as an exchange unless the shareholder meets the bright line change-in-stock-ownership tests.
- Legal Concepts33) An unconditional and absolute offer by a contracting party to perform his or her obligationsunder the contract is known as an injunction.
- 1250 recaptures as ordinary income, the excess of accelerated depreciation over straight-line depreciation on real property, but generally no longer applies under current law