Back to Questions
Want to know:
Which of the following statements is correct regarding the taxes payable under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA)?1. The amount is determined as a percentage of all compensation paid to an employee2. Liability arises only when wages are actually, not constructively, paid to employees3. Credits for this tax are allowed to employers for certain state unemployment paid by the employer
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- Jed Bartlett (New Hampshire) posted an entry on his blog suggesting that his former friend Leo McGarry (Illinois) cheated his way through Wake Forest University 3 years ago. This led to Leo losing his job at a regional consulting firm. He sued Jed for defamation, asserting $100,000 in damages, in Illinois federal court. Illinois's statute of limitations is two years. However federal courts use the doctrine of laches, which instead of imposing a firm statute of limitations, bars claims only upon a showing that the plaintiff has unreasonably delayed bringing their claim.Working with a neighbor, decide whether under Erie, the federal court would use Illinois's statute of limitations or the federal doctrine of laches. If you think Erie does not clearly answer the question of what to do, formulate a test for how courts can decide what to do in circumstances like this.
- Bastilla owns a tennis racket stringing business in North Carolina. After Revan is elected governor of North Carolina, he imposes all sorts of costly regulations on tennis racket stringers. As a result, Bastilla sees a dark future for her business and relocates to Washington State, where the burden on her business is on the light side. She ends all advertisements in North Carolina, never visits the state, and specifically refuses to ship rackets to the state. Over the years, she builds up a modestly successful business that earns about $150,000 a year. One day, Carth comes into her store and buys a racket, which works fine for several years. He moves to North Carolina and enters a senior tournament. In the finals, he plays Malak (domiciled in North Carolina). Midway through the match, the racket explodes due to some gunpowder being mistakenly included in the frame. Both Malak and Carth are injured. They sue Bastilla's business in North Carolina state court. Bastilla files a motion to dismiss. What result under Justice Brennan's framework?A.Denied because Bastilla has minimum contacts in North Carolina.B.Denied because there are minimum contacts among the parties.C.Granted because Bastilla has no purposeful minimum contacts in North Carolina.D.Granted because the reasonableness factors cannot support personal jurisdiction.
- Which of the following holds that revocation of an offer is effective only when it is received by the offeree?