Want to know:

"The revolutionary moment was neither radical nor a watershed for American women. Those who disregard America's commitment to patriarchal rule and plead for a historical interpretation that favors enlightened exceptionalism have overlooked the conditions that made large-scale change all but impossible at that time and place." Elaine Forman Crane, historian, Ebb Tide in New England: Women, Seaports, and Social Change, 1630-1800, published in 1998 (Revolution didn't really address or change the position of women)"The coming of the American Revolution... created new opportunities for women to participate in politics. Responding to men's appeals, women engaged in a variety of actions in support of the revolutionary cause, which led women to experience a greater sense of connection to and involvement with the polity. After the war their political contributions were praised, celebrated, and remembered.... Women now were seen as political beings who had the capacity to influence the course of war, politics, and history." Rosemarie Zagarri, historian, Revolutionary Backlash: Women and Politics in the Early American Republic, published in 2007 1Using the excerpts above, answer (a), (b), and (c).1a) Briefly describe ONE major difference between Crane's and Zagarri's historical interpretations of the immediate impact of the American Revolution on women.

Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.