Back to Questions
Want to know:
Bouakham voluntarily enrolls in a skydiving course at OpenSkies Pvt. Ltd. (OpenSkies), an adventure firm. She signs a contract that relieves OpenSkies of liability. After receiving proper instruction, she jumps from an airplane. Unfortunately, Bouakham is injured when she could not steer her parachute toward the target area while landing. She sues the parachute center for damages. But the court found that the contract protected OpenSkies from damages, as Bouakham had voluntarily joined the course knowing all the risks involved. What kind of contractual provision protected OpenSkies from having to pay Bouakham damages?A) a noncompete clauseB) an exculpatory clauseC) the duty of restitutionD) disaffirmance
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- quelle différence de l'excuse de minorité entre les 2 catégories de mineurs ?
- Trade secrets are primarily regulated at the State level, and are subject to the laws of unfair competitionAssumption of Riskbusiness tort lawCopyright ActLanham Act and State LawsPatent ActSports Exception DoctrineThe Magnuson-Moss Act
- the legal enforcement of an otherwise unenforceable contract due to a party's detrimental reliance on the contractIllusory PromisesPrivity of ContractPromissory EstoppelQuasi Contracts