Back to Questions
Want to know:
intent of ___ act was to-prevent plaintiff's attorneys from forum shopping
Get a detailed, AI-powered explanation for this question and thousands more on StudyFetch.
Get the Answer for FreeHow StudyFetch Helps You Master This Topic
AI-Powered Answers
Get instant, detailed explanations powered by AI that understands your course material.
Deep Understanding
Go beyond surface-level answers with step-by-step breakdowns and examples.
Personalized Learning
Spark.E adapts to your learning style and helps you connect ideas.
Practice & Test
Turn any question into flashcards, quizzes, and practice tests to solidify your knowledge.
Explore More Questions
- After losing a light saber duel with Darth Vader, Luke Skywalker sues Vader for battery on March 1, 2019. On March 20, 2019, Vader files an answer denying liability. On March 29, Vader makes a motion to strike three paragraphs of Skywalker's complaint where Skywalker made fun of Vader's mother, saying she was so boring even cash-hungry Disney wouldn't bother making a movie about her life. On April 15, Skywalker attempts to amend his complaint to add facts supporting his battery claim. Which of the following is true under Rule 15(a)(1)?A.The amendment will be allowed because it was within 21 days of Vader's motion to strike.B.The amendment will be allowed because a responsive pleading wasn't required.C.The amendment will not be allowed.D.The amendment will not be allowed because you can only amend within 21 days of getting an answer.
- Legal Concepts12Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc.57) Rudy was working as an applications developer in a software firm in San Jose. Hisemployment contract was for three years at $100,000 a year. Two years into the contract, Rudy'semployer fired him as a part of downsizing. Which of the following jobs could Rudy take inorder to mitigate damages?A) Any job that offers $100,000 or more a year.B) Another software applications developer job, irrespective of the salary.C) A job in any software firm in any part of the country.D) An applications developer job in San Jose for $100,000 a year or more.
- A citizen of State A asserted a state law claim of $80,000 against a citizen of State B in the federal district court. The State B citizen has a state law claim against another citizen of State B for $90,000 that arose out of the same transaction or occurrence as the original complaint. As a result, the State B citizen brought a third-party action against that person.Does the court have subject matter jurisdiction over the State B citizen's claim in the third-party action?A No, because the amount in controversy is insufficient.B No, because there is no diversity of citizenship.C Yes, because the requirements of diversity jurisdiction have been met.D Yes, because the court has supplemental jurisdiction.